Metanarrative and The Simpsons

In particular, the episode ''22 Short Films About Springfield'' holds many of the theories and key terms used in Post modern critique and art alike.

As well as the obvious post modern, pastiche and borrowing from other media (with alarming success) that The Simpson's uses, a lot of people argue that the show argues cultural, political and religious points
e.g. Many TV critics believe the character chief wiggum, portrayed as the governing and powerful authority in the fictional town of Springfield, despite being 'in charge' so to speak, is actually grossly incompetent at what he does, and is actually more along the lines of a less well rounded child than someone you would assume to be of a higher intellect. is this a stab at the governing bodies of America? or is it just funny that the town sheriff is a buffoon?

The same feature is noted for many other 'powerful characters', The reverend is an emotionless self involved man, the lawyer is a money grabbing free loader, the doctor like all of the before mentioned is again grossly incompetent for what he does.

The reason i chose this episode in particular, is it shows many of the characters, is very ''borrowed'' and ''re-worked'', it is also very aware of itself, often citing cultural references as well as references to itself, occasionally breaking the fourth wall, and ''spilling the beans''.

the exhaustive list of over 1000 characters is considered by many an ample amount, considering the shows longevity and style. however it is because of this, characters such as Barney the town drunk, the lonely grandpa, The local bully Nelson (the list goes on) that Simpson's reflects and parodies the pluralism of post modern society, in the most obvious of symbolic ways.
this episode shows how the characters, all varying from one another act as cogs, each having their own outrageous storyline, yet the town works because of it.

being unable to pin the show down to one genre, is what makes it post modern, the episode starts with the most mundane intro, yet finishes with the whole town congregating into a final scene.

Maggie Simpson...the poster child (literally of post modernism). the baby has lived for over 20 years, yet still wears a baby grow and sucks a dummy. although clearly the Simpson's represents contemporary social America, they also live in 'no time' 'no place' and are not specifically anyone, yet this paradox allows them represent every American family at any time during this post modern era.

I need help condensing the key points and theories really. there is a ton to work with and i do find myself jumping around. I really just need some sort of outline of which key theory/ies i could possibly work more with.

thanks Phil

4 comments:

  1. Hey Elly - okay, I'll probably add more to this over the weekend, I just didn't want to think I was ignoring you! Firstly, you only have 2,000 words and its much better to saying something meaningful about less, than something generic about more.

    The theoretical challenge of this essay is to ensure you answer the 'why' question, which underpins the 'how'. The 'How is The Simpsons postmodern?' question you've answered - because it uses appropriation and pastiche and 'mash-ups' endlessly... it takes the original work of others and recombines them into new stories (Death of the Author). The difficult (and important) bit is for you to demonstrate your understanding of 'Why' The Simpsons operates that way - what societal shift does the programme illustrate? And why are pastiche, spoofs, mash-ups etc. particularly postmodern?

    What I suggest you do in the first instance is this; do LOTS of research in which you search 'The Simpsons/Postmodernism' and use your blog to gather together all the quotes that might prove useful; look far and wide, and keep at it, until you start to see repeat patterns of ideas, concepts, words etc - make sure you only use published sources and make sure you keep a record of all the sources for your bibliography. Harvest all the info and then track through it; do this in the first instance, and then we'll talk again.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thank you Phil, I know you've got limited time to check out our blogs etc. so don't think your help isn't appreciated here.

    I did start talking about the writer/creators antidisestablishmentaristic (spelling fail for sure) views and messages they put into the episodes. is this something i should elaborate more on?

    Finding something to work more concisely on is the target i think for me, so i will attempt to do some more research on one paticular point, before i begin writting nonsense.

    thanks again Phil, I do appreciate the help :)

    ReplyDelete
  3. Personally, I think you should look squarely at Death of the Author as the theoretical 'spanner' for opening up The Simpsons (because Death of the Author' will allow you to talk about pastiche and appropriation). On myUCA/postmodernism/unit materials find the lecture 'Brokeback Mountain & the Death of the Author' and have another listen. But, trust me - go Roland Barthes and Death of the Author on this...

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nice one Phil, Will download the lecture now and get to work.

    Thanks

    ReplyDelete